Staying Childfree – Why we’re not having children

At least not biological ones.

At first glance, this might not be something that belongs in a personal finance blog. But since this is our personal finance blog, I get to add a dash of philosophy on top of our frugal lifestyle and saving hacks.

As the title says, at the present moment, neither Mr. Frugasaurus nor me are interested changing our childfree status. We have discussed this several times, and usually we reach a conclusion akin to “Well, if we really want to raise children, there are plenty of children already on the planet who needs some love.”. Right now though? We are happy being a small, childless household.

Sure, this can be explained by the cost of having and rearing a child. But to be completely honest, that is not the main reason we have reached this decision. 

1. Freedom

Neither of us have travelled that much yet. We lived abroad for a few years, but never outside of Europe. While the option of travel is a minor thing, the bigger argument for the both of us is that we still have a plethora of things we would like to focus our time on. We have not prioritised looking for a flat which allows pets in order to adopt, because we haven’t had the time, economy nor willingness to commit. Considering how a child is an even bigger and more long-term commitment, it is simply not the right choice for us.

Writing, activism, blogging, creating a business, all of these are things that we would not be a able to spend as much time on with a child in the mix. I have no issue with people who prioritise differently. For us though, this is how we wish to spend our time right now, tinkering away at the various projects and brainchildren we have going on. Mr. Frugasaurus is not willing to give up his writing aspirations, and I have a job that will demand 100 % of me for the next handful of years.

Image from

2. The environment

I will admit it, as a big, concerned environment geek, this was probably the biggest factor for me in choosing whether or not to stay childfree. As the above image shows, there is no personal choice that will impact your personal contribution to climate change as much as having a child (or having another child, as the choice might stand for some).

We don’t have a car, I walk to work every day, we eat a primarily plant-based diet, we line dry our clothes, recycle, and don’t travel a whole lot. Still, as you can see, all that effort does not even add up to the effect one whole, new human being on this earth would contribute.

When you think about it, it does make a lot of sense. A whole new person means a whole new lifetime of potentially good or bad choices for the climate. Will they recycle? Will they drive a car? Will they buy fast fashion and generate lots of waste? Will they want a big house, using lots of materials and land? Will they themselves have children, and if so, how many?

In short, having a child could more than double the impact you will have on climate change. Because my goal is to become financially independent as soon as possible in order to enjoy a life in the woods with homegrown food, it is relevant to my interest whether or not the climate and associated weather will be more extreme or not by then. Buying someplace not at risk for flooding is already high on our priority lists. What other aspects will be necessary by the time we have the economy to make the move?

Lastly, as part of this segment, I believe there are too many people on this planet as it is. We are displacing wildlife, who has just as much right to live on this planet as we do. How tragic, if we can only show the future generations clips of wild animals on tape or in pictures. That is not a future I wish to see, and in my own, modest way, I try to do my best to avoid that.

3. Economy

While the Frugalwoods amiably demonstrate how it is absolutely possible to have children without breaking the bank, they do have some costs attached. This is, after all, a whole, new human being we are talking about, with specific needs and wants of their own. At the very least, they will need clothes (free or not), at least some toys, food, school equipment and lots of time and love. The latter could have a serious impact on anyone’s economy, as it relates to our ability to work overtime, focus on that sidehustle or get a second income stream.

On the other hand, while it might be possible to live off hand-me-downs and free furniture (something we wholeheartedly support!), a lot of calculations people make are under the assumptions that they will have an able-bodied, healthy child. As soon as that child is outside what is considered ‘normal’, those costs might very well skyrocket, depending on the infrastructure in place for your specific country. While that might not be a very comfortable thought or discussion to have, I think it is absolutely necessary to think about how your life and finances might be impacted, should you have a child that requires special care.

4. Personal desires

4 reasons why we are not having childrenAs a last point on this list, there is the simple fact that Mr. Frugasaurus and myself simply do not want children at the present time. We are both lucky to have families who do not pester us endlessly about this, and several of our friends enjoy a childfree existence too. While having a child might be important to you, I think we could all do well to remember that in today’s society (with booming populations and thousands of children in need of a home), having a child is a matter of personal fulfilment and should be treated thus, not as a necessity or a human right.

14 Comments on “Staying Childfree – Why we’re not having children

  1. I loved and enjoyed your blog. It seems like you and Mr. E are fairly young, and what I’ve realized from talking to my clients, I am a dog trainer, is that young couples don’t seem to be in a rush to have children. I believe that you should do what feels right for you and your husband/wife. I was raised by my mom and aunts, mostly one of my aunts, and what that taught me from the time I was very young is that a child doesn’t necessarily have to be your biological child. My aunt, I call her mami Elvirita, was the best mom anybody could have had. She gave me structure, discipline, a an abundance of love. Because of that I never was worried about my clock ticking. In my late 30’s I wanted to adopt a kid, but my partner was not ready so I decided that it was not the right time. I, then, got into dogs and I love, love my job so kids wasn’t something I even considered. Guess what? My partner, now wife, wanted to adopt about 2 years ago. I told her, “Sure, as long as you stay home with the kid and I go out and work a regular 9 to 5 job”. She said, “forget it”. And we left it at that. I am happy with my dogs and wife. I think you should do it only if you are ready. I did want to be a mom. I had my aunt as a wonderful example of one, but for one reason or another it just did not happen. I am about to turn 50, yes, 50 years old, and I enjoy my life with my dogs and wife. I believe that you should find happiness, and happiness is different from one person to another. The best to you and Mr. E.

    • Thank you for your thoughtful and insightful comment.

      Yes, I wholeheartedly agree that children do not have to be biological. Mr. E. And I are in full agreement on this. Why create a new life when there are so many lives in need of help anyway? I have heard so many stories from people who, like you, were raised primarily by someone not their biological parents. And the consensus in all those cases has been that it was the best solution for them. So a big kudos to all those kind-hearted men and women who open their hearts and their homes to children who need it.

  2. This is an excellent list of reasons why not to have kids. Unless you REALLY REALLY want kids, don’t do it. They are a serious life changing experience that you can’t take back. (We did decide to have a kiddo, so obviously we still landed on the worth it side of the line)

    Funny enough, our reasons to stop at one are much the same.

    • Yes! This is a very personal decision, and I just wish more people made it consciously, rather than the “oh, ops!” I see so prevalently.

      Still, there are so many children in need of a home. We figure it will be just as rewarding to adopt, should the need ever arise. ?

  3. Really interesting post; we very, very much wanted both our kids but boy – are they still tough. The idea that someone *should* have kids is just crazy. It’s very much a desire, not a necessity. I read a really interesting article a while back about the number of people that regret having children; so much so that when Nebraska created a “safe haven” law (you can leave your newborn child at a hospital or fire station without repercussion) and forgot to put an age cap on it, people brought kids of all ages, some in their teens, to Nebraska, and dropped them off. It was crazy, and horrifying, but it emphasized just how much people sometimes have kids because of lack of reproductive health options, societal pressure, etc (as well as broader issues related to lack of societal support and psychiatric care). Good on you for standing by your values.

    • That is really sad and horrifying. I knew about a few countries who have “safe haven” boxes for newborns, but had never heard about people doing it with older children! I really cannot even begin to imagine how that must feel to the child.

  4. Pingback: Mr. E’s sleep experiment - Frugasaurus

  5. Pingback: Teaching As A Part Of The Human Experience - Frugasaurus

  6. Pingback: Our Perfect Life - Frugasaurus

  7. Pingback: The Benefits of Dating a Trans Man - Frugasaurus

  8. Pingback: Our Decluttering Box And Other Tips - Frugasaurus

  9. Pingback: How we save on our grocery bill, but still eat fresh produce - Frugasaurus

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *